Legal Opinion
Doe v. County of Santa Clara
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 11, 2025No. 4:22-cv-04948Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04948-JSW 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 75 11 12 13 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss the Third Amended 14 Complaint (“TAC”) filed by Defendant County of Santa Clara (“County”). The Court has 15 considered the parties’ papers and relevant legal authority, and it finds this matter suitable for 16 disposition without oral argument. See…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.