Legal Opinion

Pixley v. VanNostern

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1885No. 11,933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

Action by the appellee against the appellants upon a promissory note executed by the latter to one Mary E. "Warner, and by her endorsed to the appellee. The appellants answered, admitting the execution of the note to the payee named therein, but alleging that she was then, and ever since the execution of the note had been, the owner thereof in her own right; that the plaintiff had not, and never did have, any right, title or interest in or to said note other than as the agent and trustee of said payee; that the note was assigned to the plaintiff for the purposes of collection and not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swift v. EllsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Wilson v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Hereth v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Lewis v. SheamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State ex rel. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Tyler v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API