Legal Opinion

Holmes v. . Carr

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from 0. H. Allen, J., at May Term, 1913, •of GREENE. ,

1Opinion of the CourtOlabk, C. J.

Tbe plaintiffs except to tbe admission of a deed from them to T. "W. Carr, tbe father of defendants, on tbe ground tbat tbe probate was improperly taken by W. Gr. Carr, tbe son of tbe said T. "W. Carr, as justice of tbe peace. Said probate was taken by.bim in 1894, and at tbat time be bad no interest in tbe property to wbicb be succeeded, together with tbe other defendants, as heirs at law of their father, T. 'W. Carr, who died in 1903.

¥e have numerous decisions tbat an acknowledgment of a deed by tbe husband and wife and privy examination of.wife taken before a justice of tbe peace,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. . ConnellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Long v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. McAllister v. . PurcellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Zimmerman v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Gregory v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cowan v. DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Cowan v. . DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. A. Campbell King, Jr., and Wife, Mary Jane King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  4. Investment Company v. . Wooten Wooten v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API