Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Caruso

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 28, 2014No. 12-P-1096PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMilkey, J.

In 1999, following a jury trial in District Court, the defendant was convicted of two counts of malicious destruction of property (a car), G. L. c. 266, § 127. In 2001, this court affirmed those convictions in an unpublished memorandum and order. Commonwealth v. Caruso, 52 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2001). Seven years later, after the defendant was convicted of murdering the owner of the damaged car, he filed a motion for new trial. He argued that newly discovered evidence definitively proved that he could not have been the person who damaged *25the car. That motion was heard and denied by the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Commercial Union Insurance v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. WeichellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. LykusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Commonwealth v. ChukwueziMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. SergioMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. StapletonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API