Crater Corporation v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. And American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Crater Corporation (“Crater”) sued Lu-cent Technologies, Inc. and American Telephone and Telegraph Company (collectively, “Lucent”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri alleging that Lucent infringed Crater’s U.S. Patent No. 5,286,129 (the “‘129 patent”). The ‘129 patent is directed to an underwater coupling device (the “Crater coupler”). Crater also alleged state-law claims against Lucent for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. Lucent moved to dismiss Crater’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Toxgon Corporation v. Bnfl, Inc., and Gts Duratek (Now Known as Duratek, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- John M.J. Madey v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Scaltech, Inc. v. Retec/tetra, LLC, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and General Dynamics Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Colvin Cattle Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.