Picard Const. Co. v. Board of Com'rs
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
This case comes before us on appeal from a judgment against plaintiff on the merits; the defendant has answered the appeal, praying that its exception of no 'cause of action be sustained.. As we think the exception is well taken, and as in fact the supplemental petition and the trial on the merits has simply amplified the allegations of the main petition, adding thereto nothing new on which a judgment for plaintiff could be based, we will dispose of the case on that exception.
I
Plaintiff alleges that it entered into a certain (amended) contract 'to do certain excavating work for defendant, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- The Kronprinzessin CecilieSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lowber v. BangsSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sicula Oceanica, S.A. v. Wilmar Marine Engineering & Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Pittman Construction Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Brasher v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- McElveen v. CallahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- State v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.