Legal Opinion
Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 31, 2011No. Case No. C 09-03704 SBAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ecological Rights Foundation (“Plaintiff’) brings the instant action against Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric (“PG & E”) and Pacific Bell Telephone (“Pacific Bell”) alleging that their wooden utility and telephone poles, respectively, *1058are discharging a toxic chemical, pentachlorophenol, into the environment in violation of the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. The parties are presently…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Aurora Energy Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2013
- City of Imperial Beach v. Int'l Boundary & Water Comm'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Shade v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.