Legal Opinion

State v. Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 2014No. 90PA13PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Justice.

Petitioner Edy Charles Banks, Jr., in his motion for appropriate relief (MAR), claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) when his trial counsel failed to object on double jeopardy grounds to his being sentenced by the trial court for both statutory rape and second-degree rape when the convictions were predicated on a single act of sexual intercourse with the victim. We conclude that defendant was properly convicted of both statutory rape and second-degree rape committed during a single act of sexual intercourse and that separate punishments for each…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Aaron ShellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  4. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API