Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Clausen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1909No. 7779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court, December 11, 1908, for a writ of mandamus directing the state auditor to issue warrants.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

— A petition for a rehearing has been filed in this case, in which it is claimed that the court disregarded the provisions of § 4 of art. 8, of the state constitution, in awarding its writ of mandate. The section cited reads as follows:

“No moneys shall ever be paid out of the treasury of this state, or any of its funds, or any of the funds under its management, except in pursuance of an appropriation by law; nor unless such payment be made within two years from the first day of May next after the passage of such appropriation act, and every such law making a new appropriation, or…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. StirratWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ohnstad v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Davis v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API