Ohnstad v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Retired employees (hereinafter called the plaintiffs) of the Tacoma Transit Company (hereinafter called the Company) bring this action to compel the city of Tacoma (hereinafter called the City) to pay them the pension to which they were entitled under an agreement (hereinafter called the Pension Agreement) between the Company and the Amalgamated Association of Street and Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 758 (hereinafter called the Union).
Until April, 1961, pension payments were made to the plaintiffs from a pension fund into which the individual employees of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jellum v. Normanna Lodge No. 3Washington Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Johnson v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ClabornWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- WASH. STATE FARM BUREAU FEDER. v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.