Legal Opinion

Ohnstad v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1964No. 37311PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Retired employees (hereinafter called the plaintiffs) of the Tacoma Transit Company (hereinafter called the Company) bring this action to compel the city of Tacoma (hereinafter called the City) to pay them the pension to which they were entitled under an agreement (hereinafter called the Pension Agreement) between the Company and the Amalgamated Association of Street and Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 758 (hereinafter called the Union).

Until April, 1961, pension payments were made to the plaintiffs from a pension fund into which the individual employees of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jellum v. Normanna Lodge No. 3Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. ClabornWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. WASH. STATE FARM BUREAU FEDER. v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API