Legal Opinion

Brennan v. DeCosta

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 28, 1987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neighbors, no longer friendly, dispute the right to use a street shown on a plan recorded in 1897 but never laid out on the ground. The DeCostas, defendants, claim the right to close and use a portion of the paper street, Fem Avenue, in Middleton. A judge of the Land Court determined, adversely to the DeCostas, that abutters on Fem Avenue, notably the plaintiffs, have the right to use Fem Avenue as shown on the 1897 plan for all purposes for which streets or ways are used in Middleton.1

1. Status of the way. As a general mle, the title of persons who acquire land bounded by a street or way mns…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Casella v. SneiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Lawton v. DracousisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Wellwood v. Havrah Mishna Anshi Sphard Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Silvia v. BLDG. INSPECTOR OF WEST BRIDGEWATERMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  2. Tattan v. KurlanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Feldman v. SouzaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  4. Zora Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. McGovern v. McGovernMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API