Legal Opinion

In re Grand Jury Subpoena No. 2013R00691-009

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2016No. DOCKET NO. 3:16-mc-00079-FDW-DCKPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*770ORDER

Frank D. Whitney, Chief United States District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Movant law firm’s Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoena 2013R00691-009.1 (Doc. No. 1). The parties submitted written briefs and oral arguments to the Court, and the matter is ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, Movant law firm’s Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 28, 2016, the United States served Grand Jury Subpoena No. 2013R00691-009 upon a law firm (“Mov-ant”). Movant maintains offices in North Carolina, South Carolina, and other locations outside the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Fox v. AlfiniSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. In re Fox v. AlfiniSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. Mason v. Health Management Associates, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API