Legal Opinion
Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. PROT. NAT. INS.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 8, 1994No. 92-1616PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
631 So.2d 305 (1993)
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., APPELLANT,
v.
The PROTECTIVE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA, Appellee.
No. 92-1616.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 26, 1993.
Opinion Granting Rehearing in Part February 8, 1994.
Hicks Anderson & Blum and Bambi Blum, Miami, Reid Ricca & Rigell, and Leigh E. Lassiter, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Karen J. Haas, John J. Spiegel, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
2Per curiam 1
This is an appeal by the defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company [Aetna], a primary general liability insurance carrier, from an…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Harvey Thomas Smoot, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Feliberty v. DamonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Rissman v. KilbourneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Foremost Signature Insurance Company v. Silverboys, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021