Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 17, 1999No. CIV.A. 97-5341(JWB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BISSELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Port Authority of New York and New Jersey’s (“Port Authority”) motion for summary judgment. On October 30, 1997, plaintiff Paul Mullen (“Mullen”) filed a four-count Complaint in this Court alleging that his termination by the Port Authority violated the U.S. Constitution, the New Jersey Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the Court is the Port Authority’s motion for summary judgment.
This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
FACTS
The facts of this case are largely undisputed.
Paul…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Caceres v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Caceres v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NJCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011