Legal Opinion
Hunacek v. Union Welfare Fund Local 202
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
The issue in this case is one of first impression. The novelty of the issue presented to the court herein, upon an agreed statement of facts, is whether by reason of the application of our "no-fault” statutes (Insurance Law, § 672; art 18) plaintiffs are entitled to a windfall, that is, in addition to payment under no-fault, are they entitled to duplicate such receipt of payment under defendant’s Union Welfare Fund. The agreed upon facts relevant to the issue involved are as follows:
Union Local 202, I.B.T. is an organized labor union in which plaintiff,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Bell v. Employee Security Benefit Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1977
- National Bank of North America v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 3Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n Production Workers Welfare FundNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re WimmerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1990
- Greenberg v. Medi-Cab Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Levy v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Levy v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.