Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUNDS, Judge.
Defendants and third-party plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to plaintiffs and third-party defendants and imposition of Rule 11 sanctions. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Plaintiff David Hummer (Hummer) was a “career status teacher” in the Durham Public School system. On 12 June 1997, during a teacher workday at Northern Durham High School, Hummer was approached by the principal, Isaac Thomas (Thomas). A heated exchange ensued, and Hummer told Thomas that if Thomas wished to take another teacher’s side in a personal conflict with Hummer, *274Thomas…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Lewis v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Piraino Bros. v. Atlantic Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Wrenn v. HolyfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In Re Estate of WhitakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.