Legal Opinion

Lewisburg & Northern R. R. v. Dudley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

This is a proceeding, under the statutes, to appropriate land for a railroad right-of-way. The trial in the circuit court was before the judge without a jury. The plaintiff contended that the land taken for the right-of-way was confined to a detached lot 50' by 195 feet purchased by defendant from George C. Waters September 26,1911, to support a claim for incidental damages to another tract of 29[4 acres; and that he cannot recover incidental damages to the larger tract because the lot bought from Waters was separated from the other land by a 40-foot street and because the land taken was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Illinois Cent. R. v. MoriarityTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hinton v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Louisville Property Co. v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Laman v. Big Spring State Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1998
  2. Blevins v. Johnson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. RascoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Memphis v. HoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Betty v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API