Legal Opinion

James R. Manley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1956No. 12859PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, former postmaster at Holland, Ohio, was found guilty under the second count of an Information charging him with knowingly and wilfully making a false, fictitious and fraudulent statement on a post office form in which he reported officially a burglary of that post office, “whereas in fact such statement was not a full and complete report.” The section of the United States Code charged in that count to have been violated is section 1001, Title 18.

Appellant was convicted also upon the third count of the information, which charged violation, again of section 1001, Title 18,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Little v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Echert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin Wallace PennixCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. State v. AmersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. United States v. Peter Collins, A/K/A "Gypsy Black", and Inett BranchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Willie Thomas Rudolph, William E. Taylor and Albert ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Wallace Eugene McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API