Legal Opinion

Lane Bros. v. Barnard's Administrator

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 12, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Lynchburg in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants assign error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This writ of error brings under review a verdict and judgment in the Corporation Court of the city of Lynchburg for $1,500, in an action brought by James S. Barnard's administrator against Lane Brothers Company for the recovery of damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, caused, it is alleged, by the negligence of the defendant.

The substance of the charge of negligence made in the declaration is that the automatic safety valve on defendant’s steam engine, at a point where defendant, on the Boonesboro road, in the county of Campbell, near the city of Lynchburg, had placed certain road…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. Ellington's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  3. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. Daily's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. GeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Owen v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. East Tennessee Telephone Co. v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Valz v. GoodykoontzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  5. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API