Legal Opinion

Bowens v. City of Atmore

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided March 27, 2001No. Civ.A. 99-0593-CB-LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BUTLER, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 37). The parties have filed briefs and evidentiary materials in support of their respective positions. (Docs.38, 57-59, 63-64). 1 Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments as expressed in these filings and of all other relevant materials in the file, the Court concludes that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due to be granted as to the plaintiffs’ federal claims and that the plaintiffs’ state law claims are due to be dismissed without…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Sisk v. ManzanaresDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  2. Powers v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002
  3. Weaver v. James Bonding Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Powers v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. DONALDSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API