Legal Opinion

Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1989No. Nos. 17212, 17219, 17316 and 17655PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

These consolidated appeals arise from a long and bitter dispute over a phosphate mining lease in eastern Idaho. We previously examined the controversy in Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co., 112 Idaho 441, 732 P.2d 679 (Ct.App.1986) (Alumet I). There, we held that the controlling question was whether the lessee had satisfied an implied covenant to engage in active mining. On remand, the district court found that the lessee had failed to do so. *981The court adjudged the lessee to be in default and specified the performance necessary to effect a cure. Today we affirm that judgment,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re Adoption of IronsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Pace v. HymasIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Independence Lead Mines Co. v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API