Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Allen Romo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 2005No. 04-30131PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

Robert Romo appeals his conviction for threatening the President in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 871(a). Although he confessed to a licensed counselor that he made such a threat, he now claims that the counselor’s trial testimony was admitted in violation of the psychotherapist-patient privilege. We conclude that the testimony was not privileged because Romo’s statements to the counselor did not occur during the course of diagnosis or treatment. We are not persuaded that Romo’s challenge to the testimony of the Director of Mail Analysis for the White House merits reversal,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. Lawrence Antelope, United States of America v. Lawrence AntelopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert D. Stewart, Jr., AKA Robert Wilson Stewart, Bob StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. BagdasarianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. ParrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. California Psychiatric TransitionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API