Legal Opinion

Jamison v. S & H ASSOCIATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1985No. 84-260PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

In this landlord-tenant case, the tenant appeals from an order striking his pleadings and entering judgment in favor of the landlord because the tenant failed to comply with a protective order. The tenant argues that the trial court erred in failing to consider his assertion that he did not waive his right to a notice to quit, despite the landlord’s contrary allegation in the complaint. We agree and reverse.

The landlord sued the tenant for possession of an apartment after the tenant had failed to pay rent for seven months. In the complaint, which was typed on a printed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Rental Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Moody v. Winchester Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Barr v. Rhea Radin Real Estate, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Battle v. NashDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Graham v. BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Burns v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Haynes v. LoganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. King v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API