King v. Jones

King, a former tenant of the premises in question, appeals from a judgment of possession for the landlord, Jones, entered because of King’s failure to comply with a protective order requiring him to pay $475.00 per month into the court registry while Jones’s suit for possession was pending. King argues that the notice to cure or vacate was defective in that it failed to contain information which both a statute and a regulation *65require of a notice of intent to evict (as in this case) for a reason other than nonpayment of rent. See D.C.Code § 45-2551(a), (b) (1990); 14 DCMR § 4802.1 (July…