Legal Opinion

HASFAL v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 31, 2009No. AC 29479PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Christopher Hasfal, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. After the court granted the petition for certification to appeal, this appeal followed. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly found that he had failed to prove that his trial counsel had rendered ineffective assistance. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts and procedural history provide the necessary background for the disposition of the petitioner’s appeal. The petitioner was convicted, after a jury…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. HasfalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. HASFAL v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Hasfal v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API