HASFAL v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Christopher Hasfal, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. After the court granted the petition for certification to appeal, this appeal followed. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly found that he had failed to prove that his trial counsel had rendered ineffective assistance. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history provide the necessary background for the disposition of the petitioner’s appeal. The petitioner was convicted, after a jury…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. HasfalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
4Cited by2 opinions
- HASFAL v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hasfal v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009