Legal Opinion
State v. Hasfal
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 11, 2006No. AC 26087PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, Christopher Hasfal, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal violation of a protective order under General Statutes § 53a-223. On appeal, the defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant and the victim were involved in a romantic relationship that became abusive. On August 22, 2003, the victim telephoned the police following a violent incident with the defendant.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Ghant v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. WardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. OsimantiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. WinterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- HASFAL v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.