Chisholm v. McCarthy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiff’s intestate, herein called the plaintiff, originally brought this action of contract to recover a broker’s commission for procuring a purchaser for the Lawrence Hotel and nearby cottages at Salisbury Beach. The property, which was owned by the defendant Warner, admittedly was sold by her to one Traynor and one Chadwick, the defendants’ principal contention being that another broker was the. efficient cause of the sale. The defendant McCarthy is the brother-in-law of the de*73fendant Warner, and assisted in her business. The judge in submitting the case to the jury propounded two…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kacavas v. DiamondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Whitcomb v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- John T. Burns & Sons Inc. v. HandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Sherman v. Briggs Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Nichols v. AthertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul BrukCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Bonin v. Chestnut Hill Towers Realty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Kaplan v. Henry Wenz, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Leatherbee Mortgage Co. v. CohenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- O'MALLEY v. MarkusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.