State ex rel. Recker v. Putnam County Clerk of Courts

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.1 Recker’s prohibition claim was rendered moot by both the payment of the court costs and *236the. common pleas court’s entry ordering him to pay costs. See, e.g., Miller v. Kutschbach (1996), 111 Ohio App.3d 157, 159, 675 N.E.2d 1277, 1278 (“Any argument that appellant is prejudiced because he cannot pay the court costs of $60.02 before refiling the contempt motion is moot because the record demonstrates that appellant has already paid these costs.”). In addition, appellees did not exercise judicial or quasi-judicial authority in attempting to…