Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Euster

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 27, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

This penal action was brought by the county attorney of Bell in the name of the commonwealth against Max Euster, to recover fines aggregating the sum of $3,600 for alleged violation of section 1321, Kentucky Statutes, providing that, with certain exceptions,! no work or business shall be done on the Sabbath Day. The defendant moved the court to strike the case from the record on the ground that the petition was not filed or signed by the commonwealth’s attorney, and on the further ground that it was not supported by the oath or averment of any person…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Breckinridge v. Monroe Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  3. Wells v. Miller, Com'r of FinanceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Bragg v. WittnebenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API