Baker v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of review to annul an order of the Superior Court of Shasta County, granting a defendant time in which to plead. The alternative writ was directed to the Superior Court as the sole respondent, and a copy thereof, together with a copy of the petition for the writ, was served on the judge of the court, and on the attorneys for the defendant in the action in which the order was made. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
—We think that the service in this proceeding was sufficient, and that the proper parties are before the court, and therefore the motion to quash is denied.
The return to the writ of review in this proceeding shows that in the case of L. H. Baker, petitioner herein, v. William Banks, defendant, pending in the court of respondent, an order was made by the court on the *584twenty-ninth day of December, 1886, extending the time of defendant to answer or demur until ten days after the receipt of the remittitur, in a certain other case of N. J. Pehrson v. John B. Hewitt, then pending on appeal from the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Tod v. CrismanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Jones v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Great American Insurance v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.