Billings v. Tile State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The information charges that the appellant forged the name of Louis C. Morgan, deceased, to an instrument purporting to be a promissory note; that the forgery was committed after his death, and was committed for the purpose of defrauding the estate of Louis C. Morgan.
'• The objection urged against this information is, that it «does not aver that the forgery was committed with the intent to defraud any person. The reason advanced in support of this proposition is, that the law does not regard the estate of a decedent as a person. This contention can not prevail. The estate of a decedent is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Weaver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Ginn v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Tindall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Shoffner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
- Barry v. MinahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Musgrave v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.