Legal Opinion
Rothman Realty Corp. v. Bereck
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 7, 1977PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schreiber, J.
Rothman Realty Corp., a licensed real estate broker, sued the contract purchasers of a home, Barton and Debra Bereck, husband and wife, to recover dam ages due to loss of a real estate commission when the buyers refused to consummate the transaction. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered a judgment for the defendants. The Appellate Division reversed and remanded for the entry of judgment in the amount of $5400 (the amount of the lost commission) plus interest. 140 N. J. Super. 72 (1976). We granted the defendants’ petition for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Simmons v. LibbeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Brittain v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Smith v. BretschneiderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Snyder Realty v. BMW OF N. AMER.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Davidson v. SlaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Oscar Mayer Corp. v. Mincing Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Inwood at Great Notch v. Township of Little FallsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.