Washington Legal Foundation v. U.S. Sentencing Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The Court has before it the Defendants’ and the Plaintiffs respective Motions for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned case, in which the Plaintiff, Washington Legal Foundation, seeks access to certain private meetings and documents of the United States Sentencing Commission’s Advisory Working Group on Environmental Sanctions. Based upon the Motions, the opposition thereto, the underlying record, and the applicable law, the Court must grant the Defendants’ Motion and deny the Plaintiffs Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
As part of the Sentencing Reform…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dudman Communications Corporation v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ismael Sanchez Rojas v. Warden, Otay Mesa Detention CenterDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- WASH. LEGAL FDTN. v. US Sentencing Com'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993