Legal Opinion

Karnes v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNA.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Respondents Attorney General of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Police (Respondents) 1 filed preliminary objections seeking dismissal of the petition for review filed by Roger J. Karnes (Petitioner) because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2 Petitioner is an inmate at SCI-Houtzdale, where he provided a DNA sample and his fingerprints at the end of 2002 or the beginning of 2003 pursuant to the Act of June 19, 2002, P.L. 394 (Act 57), which amended provisions of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 101-9812. 3 Petitioner seeks…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dial v. VaughnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Mazurek v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. DeWeese v. WeaverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Baravordeh v. Borough Council of Prospect ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Altoona Housing Authority v. City of AltoonaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D. Martin v. Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent James A. EckardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API