Legal Opinion

Apperson Realty Corp. v. Wolosky

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 7, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMadigan, J.

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s application for leave to serve a supplemental answer and for summary judgment in defendant’s favor are consolidated.

Plaintiff entered into a lease with Wolosky Fur Shop, Inc. In the complaint it is alleged that after the termination of the lease in summary proceedings during the month of January, 1934, there arose a “ deficiency ” such as the lease mentioned in its fourteenth paragraph. In that paragraph, referred to herein as the “ survival clause,” it was provided that, if the lessee should default or violate any covenant of the lease,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. In re Roth & AppelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  4. 58-59 Realty Corp. v. KennellyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stern v. NewtonNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API