Legal Opinion

Furze v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1935No. Civ. No. 9696PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant while driving their automobiles met with a collision at the intersection of California Street and Alcatraz Avenue in Berkeley. For injuries sustained in the accident the plaintiff commenced this action. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial but his motion was denied. From the judgment entered in favor of the defendant the plaintiff appealed and has brought up a bill of exceptions.

The plaintiff contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. ForsythTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Wilder v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kyle v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API