Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Nevada v. Friednash

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1956No. 3921PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Merrill, C. J.:

This is an action brought by respondent, as plaintiff below, to enforce the terms of an alleged contract between himself and his deceased wife, whereby, it is claimed, each agreed upon death to leave all property to the survivor. The appellants, defendants below, are the executor of the will of respondent’s deceased'wife and the beneficiaries under that will. The trial court found a binding contract to exist as alleged by respondent and impressed a trust upon the estate in his favor. From that judgment this appeal is taken.

On July 28, 1949 respondent and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hale v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
  2. Canada v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Gould v. MansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Rogers v. JoughinWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Rolls v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kirk v. BeardTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Meyer v. Texas National Bank of Commerce of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Chandler v. Estate of RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Adkins Ex Rel. Uccelli v. OppioNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Adkins Ex Rel. Uccelli v. OppioNevada Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API