Legal Opinion

MacK v. Ford Motor Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1996No. 1-94-4231PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Cynthia Brettschneider, one of the plaintiffs in this case, testified that when she purchased a 1987 Ford Mustang from defendant WilShore Motor Sales, Inc., Wil-Shore did not mention that the automobile was equipped with a fuel-inertia switch, nor did it advise her that the ignition could become inoperative upon a collision. Although she had read sections of the owner’s manual, she did not recall reading anything about a fuel inertia switch; she did, however, admit that it was possible that she had read the section mentioning the switch but did not remember. Before January 1991, both she and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Murphy v. UrsoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lillie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Davis v. Marathon Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bourgonje v. MacHevAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Malen v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. David Hakim v. Safariland, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  4. Roth v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Calloway v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API