Legal Opinion
Robertson v. United States ex rel. Baldwin Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 5, 1923No. 3854PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMYTH, Chief Justice.
The Baldwin Company claimed to be the owner of two trade-marks, used on pianos, which were registered in the Patent Office. Two proceedings to have the marks canceled were instituted by R. S. Howard Company, one of the appellants. Relief was denied it by the Commissioner of Patents, but on appeal to this court his decision pwas reversed, and the Commissioner was so advised, as provided by statute. 33 Stat. 727, § 9 (Comp. St. § 9494); section 4914 et seq., Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 9459 et seq.). From our action the Baldwin Company appealed to the Supreme Court of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Brown v. DuchesneSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Harriman v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Hygienic Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Stratton & Terstegge Co. v. Stiglitz Furnace Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- W. E. Long Co.-Independent Bakers' Cooperative v. BurdettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- R. S. Howard Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.