McRae v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
W. SHARP, Judge.
McRae appeals his sentence as a habitual violent felony offender because the trial judge initiated habitual offender treatment after McRae entered a guilty plea to aggravated assault,1 and retail theft in 1993.2 He *15also claims the imposition of $60.00 to First Step was error. We affirm.
We have repeatedly held that a judge may initiate habitual offender treatment, and we adhere to that position again in this ease.3 Dobson v. State, 665 So.2d 386 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Young v. State, 663 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Kirk v. State, 663 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Santoro v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santoro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Toliver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Kirk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Turcotte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005