Legal Opinion
Santoro v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 28, 1994No. 93-2404PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
644 So.2d 585 (1994)
Joseph SANTORO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-2404.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
October 28, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Asst. Public Defender Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
HARRIS, Chief Justice.
Once again we are faced with an alleged Ashley[1] violation. In this case, the State concedes that Joseph Santoro did not receive the requisite written notice of intent to habitualize prior to his plea…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Toliver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Grasso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Voth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kirk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Booth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Eversole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.