Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Atkins
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 20, 2019No. CASE NO. 3:19-cv-05106-RBLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Chuck Atkins and Craig Meidl's Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (FAC). Dkt. #32 & #34. Plaintiffs are a group consisting of gun dealers ("Dealers"), aspiring gun owners under the age of 21 ("Young Adults"), and gun rights advocacy organizations. They seek a declaration that several of I-1639's amendments to Washington's gun control laws are unconstitutional and ask the Court to enjoin enforcement. Specifically, Plaintiffs challenge the portions of the initiative that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Campos v. Fresno Deputy Sheriff's Association, County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Chandavong v. Fresno Deputy Sheriff's AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021