Taub v. City of Deer Park
Texas Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGonzalez, Justice
I agree with the Court that the proper measure of damages for a taking of only part of a tract is the market value of the land actually appropriated and the difference, if any, in the market value of the remainder immediately before and immediately after the taking. However, I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because Taub failed to establish damages to the remainder tract. I therefore concur in part and dissent in part with the opinion of the Court.
The basis for damages to a remainder tract is the fact that the property as a whole constituted a single tract prior to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Austin v. Capitol Livestock Auction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Olson v. Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- State v. Oak Hill Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.