Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Taub v. City of Deer Park

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1994No. D-1589Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGonzalez, Justice

I agree with the Court that the proper measure of damages for a taking of only part of a tract is the market value of the land actually appropriated and the difference, if any, in the market value of the remainder immediately before and immediately after the taking. However, I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because Taub failed to establish damages to the remainder tract. I therefore concur in part and dissent in part with the opinion of the Court.

The basis for damages to a remainder tract is the fact that the property as a whole constituted a single tract prior to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Austin v. Capitol Livestock Auction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Olson v. Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  4. State v. Oak Hill Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API