Ingram v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to 10 years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. He argues that the conviction is void as the information was brought in the name of the deputy prosecuting attorney, that certain testimony was inadmissible hearsay, and that a facsimile copy of a crime lab report was inadmissible. We find no error and affirm.
The information was brought in the name of a deputy prosecuting attorney and signed by the deputy prosecutor on behalf of “Sam Pope, Prosecuting Attorney.” Appellant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Prince v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Meny v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hart v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Hart v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003