Prince v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
Appellant Carl Prince was charged as a habitual offender with the burglary of the Fort Smith Medi-Sav Pharmacy and with theft of property valued in excess of $200.00. He represented himself at trial and was convicted of all counts and sentenced to fifty-five years. None of the six points for reversal have merit.
I
The Information
Prince contends the information is fatally flawed because it failed to conclude each count with a contra pacem clause (“against the peace and dignity of the State of Arkansas”), as required by Ark. Const, art. 7, § 49. The information was a printed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Chunestudy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Sawyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Prince v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Wetherington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.