Legal Opinion

Prince v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 1991No. CR 90-184PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellant Carl Prince was charged as a habitual offender with the burglary of the Fort Smith Medi-Sav Pharmacy and with theft of property valued in excess of $200.00. He represented himself at trial and was convicted of all counts and sentenced to fifty-five years. None of the six points for reversal have merit.

I

The Information

Prince contends the information is fatally flawed because it failed to conclude each count with a contra pacem clause (“against the peace and dignity of the State of Arkansas”), as required by Ark. Const, art. 7, § 49. The information was a printed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chunestudy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Sawyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Prince v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Wetherington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API