Legal Opinion
MEDFORD v. EON LABS, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 9, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00412Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOAH MEDFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-00412 v. OPINION & ORDER EON LABS, INC., et al., Defendants. THIS MATTER comes before the Court by way of Defendants Eon Labs, Inc. (“Eon”) and Sandoz, Inc.’s (“Sandoz,” or, together with Eon, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 40. Plaintiffs oppose Defendants’ motion. ECF No. 44. For the reasons explained below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND1 This action arises out of Defendants’ allegedly wrongful manufacturing, marketing, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.