Legal Opinion
United States v. Gregory Bennett
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 14, 2013No. 11-3245PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
On March 13, 2006, the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) interviewed Gregory Bennett in connection with a series of transactions involving marijuana, MDMA (commonly known as “ecstasy”), and crack cocaine. In an attempt to induce complete truthfulness, the government, prior to the interview, agreed not to use Bennett’s statements against him, provided that Bennett promised not to later take a position inconsistent with his interview statements. During this proffer session, Bennett admitted that he had supplied all three drugs to a government informant. After the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Michael MustreadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. AbbasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Joseph Benjamin Taylor IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Sienky LallemandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Jeffrey WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Danny HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Juan PradoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Randall CauseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Feras RahmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.