Legal Opinion

G. P. Halferty & Co. v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1948No. 30105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The question here presented involves the construction of the last proviso of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 11130 [P. P.C. § 979-103], as amended by chapter 66, p. 187, Laws of 1939, which reads as follows':

“. . . And provided further, That goods, wares and merchandise manufactured or produced in any of the territories or possessions of the United States situated outside the boundaries thereof, and all raw furs produced outside the State of Washington and brought into the state for the sole purpose of transportation through and to points without the state, while being so transported, or while held in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Turner v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. IvarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Washington Chocolate Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Star Iron & Steel Co. v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. International Export Corp. v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API