Paper Stylists, Inc. v. Fitchburg Paper Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff applies to the discretion of the court by motion in accordance with Rule 39(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for relief from its failure to make a timely demand for a jury trial as set forth in Rule 38(b) of the same rules. The defendant corporation, by its attorneys, strenuously opposes the granting of such relief upon several grounds.
The plaintiff corporation asks for the exercise of judicial discretion in its favor by a sworn affidavit of one of its attorneys to the effect that, because of inadvertence in its office, the demand for a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bowles v. SamonasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fischer Imaging Corp. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Ohlinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1955
- Arrington v. McCartyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Fairbanks Morse & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.