Legal Opinion

L. J. Brosius & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Noble

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1916No. 5041PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Cleveland County; F. B. Swank, Judge. Action by Lewis J. Brosius and E. Brosius, a corporation doing business under the firm name of L. J. Brosius & Co., -against the First National Bank of Noble. Judgment for defendant, motion for new trial overruled, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, G.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs in error against defendant in error to recover a bank deposit in the sum of $170. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court. ’ .

The material evidence shows that plaintiffs were customers of defendant, and one of plaintiffs testified that on the 29th day of April, 1911, and also on the 1st day of May, 1911, he, acting for said copartnership, deposited on each of said days with said defendant the sum of $170. The passbook of plaintiffs was introduced in evidence, and on the credit side thereof was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Riley v. BoehmMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Lawhorn v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  3. Mattocks v. LymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  4. Kerns v. McKeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Miller v. SeversSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Linebarger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Drummond v. CorbinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API